For the first time since it was determined that their names will not appear on the ballot in November, the three candidates looking to run for seats on the Winston-Salem City Council – Paula McCoy, Michael Banner, and Tony Burton – came together early this week to discuss the petition process and how they plan to move forward with their campaigns.
McCoy, Banner, and Burton were all trying to run as unaffiliated candidates, which means to appear on the ballot they must get a certain number of signatures from registered voters in the Ward they are looking to represent. But last week Tim Tsujii, director of the Forsyth County Board of Elections, informed all three candidates that they didnât have enough valid signatures.
McCoy, who is the former executive director of Northwest Child Development Corporation and Neighbors for Better Neighborhoods (NBN), is looking to run for the seat in the Northeast Ward and was originally told that she had enough signatures to appear on the ballot, but all that changed earlier this month. Just minutes before the deadline on Aug. 5, McCoy received word that at least three of her signatures came from people who donât live in the Northeast Ward.
According to Tsujii, the software used by the board of elections to verify the signatures didnât have the capability to determine in which ward someone lived, but they didnât know that at the time. During the board of elections meeting last week, Tsujii said after rechecking all of the signatures, it was determined that McCoy only turned in 265 valid signatures. To appear on the ballot she needed 281.
When discussing the signatures and her dealings with the board of elections during The Chronicle Live on Aug. 24, McCoy said she was told that she was only one name short of the 281 needed to appear on the ballot and asked if she could have time to get a valid signature. Although she was told âYes,â McCoy said when she submitted the name to the county attorney, she was told that the rules had changed.
âI was informed that the rules had changed. I now had 15 days in order to recertify all of my petitions,â McCoy said.
Banner and Burton both needed 301 signatures to appear on the ballot. Banner, a local activist and urban farmer, said he already had more than 600 signatures when he was told about the rule change. After going back and checking Bannerâs petitions, his number of valid signatures dropped to 243. âThey said due to this technicality, they were going to have to also go back and check my signatures,â Banner continued. âThe whole time I was under the impression that I was done. I was really a victim of a circumstance.â
Burton, who currently serves as the human resources manager for the Forsyth County Sheriffâs Office, said he submitted 542 signatures but only 209 were valid according to the board of elections. All three candidates said they had dozens of signatures removed because the signature on the petition didnât match the signature on their registration form.
Although the Forsyth County Board of Elections has admitted to errors on their part concerning the petition process, there is no appeal process in place and so there is no recourse for McCoy, Banner, or Burton, but they were told they can make the push as a write-in candidate. Several elected officials including Forsyth County Commissioner Fleming El-Amin have encouraged the community to demand recourse by reaching out to his colleagues on the board of commissioners.
El-Amin, who served on the local board of elections for several years before being appointed to the board of commissioners in 2017 after the death of Walter Marshall, wrote, âSince the local BOE made the error using the wrong software, they should have extended the time for all petitioners to be given additional time to submit additional names. They should not have relied on the State to direct actions.â
McCoy, who has vowed to have the most aggressive write-in campaign weâve seen, said her biggest issue with the whole process is that the candidates are being punished for something that wasnât their fault.
âThe sad part about this is that this board of elections has taken no responsibility for this when this was no fault of ours,â she said. âThis was their fault. This was their faulty equipment, their faulty software ⌠For some reason it wasnât on the right setting is what they said. Someone should have known about this beforehand and we shouldâve been informed, but should not have been penalized for somebody elseâs mistake.â
To view the open discussion with Paula McCoy, Michael Banner, and Tony Burton in its entirety, visit âThe Chronicleâ on Facebook and go to the video tab.